The Impact of State Dementia Training Requirements for Nursing Homes on Antipsychotic Medication Use.

OBJECTIVES: Nursing home (NH) staff often report not having adequate dementia-specific knowledge to effectively care for these residents. Between 2011 and 2019, 9 states in the United States implemented dementia training requirements for NH staff. This study evaluated whether the state-mandated dementia training for NH staff was associated with improving resident outcomes. DESIGN: Compared trends in antipsychotic medication before and after implementation of state training requirements to trends in states without requirements. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: NHs. METHODS: Data from Care Compare for NHs and LTCFocus were linked to state policy data. We excluded 14 states that had implemented training requirements before the start of the study period in 2011. We estimated difference-in-differences models that compared trends in antipsychotic medication use before and after implementation of training requirements in states that have newly implemented requirements to trends in states without requirements. We also investigated whether the impact of training was larger in states with more stringent training requirements (eg, specifying a minimum number of training hours) and in NHs with a special care unit for dementia and examined similar analyses for restraint use and falls. RESULTS: We found that training requirements were associated with a 0.59-percentage point reduction (95% CI -0.91 to -0.27) in antipsychotics use. Effects were larger in NHs with a special care unit for dementia and in states that had stricter training requirements. We also found that training requirements were associated with a 0.17-percentage point reduction (95% CI -0.26 to -0.07) in restraint use measure and had no impact on falls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: State requirements for NH staff dementia training were associated with a small, but significant, reduction in the use of antipsychotic medication and physical restraints.

Making the Evidence-Based Case for Clinical Site Participation in Clinical Education: An ASAHP Clinical Education Committee Project.

BACKGROUND: Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception. RESULTS: A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based. CONCLUSION: The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.

Understanding the Experiences of Family Caregivers of Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: A Grounded Theory Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Alzheimer's disease and related-dementias progress over time and result in cognitive decline, loss of independence, and behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (BPSD) that can lead to nursing home placement. Research has focused on examining the effects of nursing home placement on the family caregiver; however, their experiences are less understood. We sought to investigate the experiences and perceptions of family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. The objective was to create a conceptual model that explains the complex nature of family caregiver experience. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is part of a larger randomized controlled trial. Following a grounded theory approach, we completed 30 in-depth, one-on-one interviews with family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. Data analysis followed an iterative process that employed open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS: Our conceptual model depicts the interrelationship between contributing factors that interrelate and impact family caregiver satisfaction with nursing home care. Six factors contribute to family caregiver satisfaction: family caregiver interactions with nursing home staff; staff management of resident behavioral symptoms; nursing home context; family caregiver knowledge of dementias; family caregiver strain; and the resident experience. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings revealed family caregiver experiences that are unique to the institutional nursing home setting and not reflected in prior work focusing on experiences within community-based settings.Understanding family caregiver experiences and the contributors to how satisfaction in care is perceived, may foster collaboration and teamwork among families and staff.

Evaluating non-pharmacological approaches to nursing home dementia care: A protocol.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the daily challenges nursing home (NH) staff face caring for the residents living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). Non-pharmacological approaches are prioritized over off-label medication to manage the behavioral and psychological symptoms of ADRD. Yet, it is not clear how to best equip NH staff and families with the knowledge and strategies needed to provide non-pharmacological approaches to these residents. Methods: This clustered randomized trial will compare team- and problem-based approaches to non-pharmacological ADRD care. The team-based approach includes core training for all NH staff using a common language and strategies to support continuity and sustainability. The problem-based approach capitalizes on the expertise of the professional healthcare providers to target issues that arise. A convergent mixed methods design will be used to examine (a) comparative effectiveness of the two approaches on long-term NH resident outcomes and (b) whether either approach is protective against the negative consequences of COVID-19. The primary outcome is the percentage of ADRD residents with off-label antipsychotic medication use, which will be evaluated with an intent-to-treat approach. Staff and family caregiver perspectives will be explored using a multiple case study approach. Conclusion: This trial will be the first-ever evaluation of team- and problem-based approaches to ADRD care across multiple NHs and geographic regions. Results can provide health system leaders and policymakers with evidence on how to optimize ADRD training for staff in an effort to enhance ADRD care delivery.

Gaps and Pathways Project: driving pathways by diagnosis sheets.

This paper describes the development and use of information sheets for occupational therapy practitioners to use as guides for evaluation and intervention planning to address their client's driving and community mobility needs. Called Driving Pathways by Diagnosis Sheets, the information assists therapists with direction to connect impairment to driving risk and incorporate intervention to client goals and priorities related to driving and community mobility. An example of one of the sheets for the diagnosis of arthritis is highlighted and implications for use are discussed.